Why did the Philosophers of Ancient China Fail to Find the Syllogism?——a comparative study of Aristotle and the philosophers of ancient ChinaChinese Full Text
Jin Guantao;Liu Qingfeng
Abstract: This paper, first of all, raises doubts to the viewpoint that "the kernel of log-ical deduction is to deduce from what is universal to what is particular", which hasbeen widely accepted by the scholars both in China and abroad. It isn′t enough tofind syllogism by only defining the relationship between the "genus, species" and "theuniversal and the particular". Through the comparative studies of Aristotle′s syllogismand the thinkers of ancient China such as Gongsun Long and the Mohists, the paper... More
- Series：
(A) Mathematics/ Physics/ Mechanics/ Astronomy; (F) Literature/ History/ Philosophy
- Subject：
Logic
- Mobile Reading
Read on your phone instantly
Step 1Scan QR Codes
"Mobile CNKI-CNKI Express" App
Step 2Open“CNKI Express”
and click the scan icon in the upper left corner of the homepage.
Step 3
Scan QR Codes
Read this article on your phone.
- Download
- Online Reading
- AI Summary
Download the mobile appuse the app to scan this coderead the article.
Tips: Please download CAJViewer to view CAJ format full text.
Download: 911 Page: 1-11+79 Pagecount: 12 Size: 741K
Citation Network
Related Literature
- Similar Article
- Reader Recommendation
- Associated Author
- [1]对亚里士多德三段论的认识[J]. 郎雅莉. 科技情报开发与经济. 2007(23)
- [2]论亚里士多德三段论与传统逻辑三论段的差异性[J]. 赵楠楠. 才智. 2011(08)
- [3]公理系统视角下的亚里士多德三段论[J]. 郭姣姣. 今古文创. 2023(14)
- [4]试析亚里士多德三段论的应用[J]. 夏卫国. 青海社会科学. 2009(05)
- [5]亚里士多德的必然三段论[J]. 张家龙. 湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版). 1996(03)
- [6]亚里士多德三段论系统的一种现代解释[J]. 曹飞. 延安大学学报(社会科学版). 1991(02)
- [7]论亚里士多德三段论格的完整性[J]. 朱锦荣. 南通师专学报(社会科学版). 1993(04)
- [8]词项逻辑与亚里士多德三段论——兼复王路同志[J]. 蔡曙山. 哲学研究. 1989(10)
- [9]亚里士多德模态三段论逻辑的形式化公理系统探讨[J]. 张晓君,袁娇娇. 湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2019(01)
- [10]一个与卢卡西维兹不同的亚里士多德三段论形式系统[J]. 蔡曙山. 哲学研究. 1988(04)