The Legal Nature and Effect of Valuations Adjustment Mechanism in Chinese Environment——On the "Suzhou haifu company V.Gansu shiheng company"Chinese Full Text
Wang Yunxia
Abstract: "Suzhou haifu company V.Gansu shiheng company" is the first case about VAM being sentenced invalid in our country.It has the representative significance without doubt.But it also has aroused broad dispute of the nature of VAM according the judge’s viewpoint.VAM is a kind of property self valuation mechanism in private law,which is common in private equity investment.As an untypical contract VAM is different from the contract with effective terms and is similar with the aleatory contract.VAM whic... More
- Series：
(G) Politics/ Military Affairs/ Law
- Subject：
Law Principle, Law History; Civil Commercial Law
- Classification Code：
D923.6;D920.5
- Mobile Reading
Read on your phone instantly
Step 1Scan QR Codes
"Mobile CNKI-CNKI Express" App
Step 2Open“CNKI Express”
and click the scan icon in the upper left corner of the homepage.
Step 3
Scan QR Codes
Read this article on your phone.
- Download
- Online Reading
- AI Summary
Download the mobile appuse the app to scan this coderead the article.
Tips: Please download CAJViewer to view CAJ format full text.
Download: 1927 Page: 116-121 Pagecount: 6 Size: 183K
Citation Network
Related Literature
- Similar Article
- Reader Recommendation
- Associated Author
- [1]对赌协议的法律适用及风险防范[J]. 王云霞. 西部法学评论. 2013(01)
- [2]对赌协议的法律性质分析[J]. 焦蕾. 对外经贸. 2018(05)
- [3]股权融资中对赌协议法律性质初探[J]. 赵晋. 中国商界(下半月). 2010(07)
- [4]对赌协议法律性质的经济分析及其效力剖析[J]. 王振. 甘肃金融. 2013(05)
- [5]对赌协议本质探究及风险防范——于“不确定”中寻求“确定”[J]. 张鸽. 唐山学院学报. 2018(04)
- [6]对赌协议之性质及效力分析——以《合同法》与《公司法》为视角[J]. 华忆昕. 福州大学学报(哲学社会科学版). 2015(01)
- [7]“对赌协议”司法第一案的评析与启示[J]. 韦祎,崔蕾. 天津法学. 2013(02)
- [8]对赌协议法律问题研究[J]. 陈思婷. 时代金融. 2019(09)
- [9]对赌协议的法律结构与裁判规则——以一则非典型对赌协议案例的分析展开[J]. 陈鸣. 法律适用(司法案例). 2018(02)
- [10]对赌协议的法律性质及效力问题探析——以“甘肃世桓案”为切入点[J]. 乔文湘. 经济研究导刊. 2014(28)